spurious periodicity - significado y definición. Qué es spurious periodicity
Diclib.com
Diccionario ChatGPT
Ingrese una palabra o frase en cualquier idioma 👆
Idioma:

Traducción y análisis de palabras por inteligencia artificial ChatGPT

En esta página puede obtener un análisis detallado de una palabra o frase, producido utilizando la mejor tecnología de inteligencia artificial hasta la fecha:

  • cómo se usa la palabra
  • frecuencia de uso
  • se utiliza con más frecuencia en el habla oral o escrita
  • opciones de traducción
  • ejemplos de uso (varias frases con traducción)
  • etimología

Qué (quién) es spurious periodicity - definición

AMOUNT OF CIPHERTEXT NEEDED TO UNAMBIGUOUSLY BREAK AN ENCRYPTION SYSTEM
Spurious key

Spurious relationship         
MATHEMATICAL RELATIONSHIP IN WHICH TWO OR MORE EVENTS OR VARIABLES ARE ASSOCIATED BUT NOT CAUSALLY RELATED, DUE TO EITHER COINCIDENCE OR THE PRESENCE OF A CERTAIN THIRD, UNSEEN FACTOR
Joint effect; Nonspuriousness; Non-spuriousness; Third Variable Problem; Fallacy of causation; Spurious correlation; Specious correlation
In statistics, a spurious relationship or spurious correlationBurns, William C., "Spurious Correlations", 1997.
Spurious         
WIKIMEDIA DISAMBIGUATION PAGE
Spurious (disambiguation)
·adj Not legitimate; bastard; as, spurious issue.
II. Spurious ·adj Not proceeding from the true source, or from the source pretended; not genuine; false; adulterate.
spurious         
WIKIMEDIA DISAMBIGUATION PAGE
Spurious (disambiguation)
['spj??r??s]
¦ adjective
1. false or fake.
2. (of a line of reasoning) apparently but not actually valid.
3. archaic (of offspring) illegitimate.
Derivatives
spuriously adverb
spuriousness noun
Origin
C16: from L. spurius 'false' + -ous.

Wikipedia

Unicity distance

In cryptography, unicity distance is the length of an original ciphertext needed to break the cipher by reducing the number of possible spurious keys to zero in a brute force attack. That is, after trying every possible key, there should be just one decipherment that makes sense, i.e. expected amount of ciphertext needed to determine the key completely, assuming the underlying message has redundancy.

Claude Shannon defined the unicity distance in his 1949 paper "Communication Theory of Secrecy Systems".

Consider an attack on the ciphertext string "WNAIW" encrypted using a Vigenère cipher with a five letter key. Conceivably, this string could be deciphered into any other string—RIVER and WATER are both possibilities for certain keys. This is a general rule of cryptanalysis: with no additional information it is impossible to decode this message.

Of course, even in this case, only a certain number of five letter keys will result in English words. Trying all possible keys we will not only get RIVER and WATER, but SXOOS and KHDOP as well. The number of "working" keys will likely be very much smaller than the set of all possible keys. The problem is knowing which of these "working" keys is the right one; the rest are spurious.